Connect with us

Around 12:30 a.m. on Monday morning, Harmeet K. Dhillon, a lawyer representing journalist Andy Ngo, warned far-left criminal Antifa members that she plans on suing them “into oblivion.”

“Goodnight everyone except Antifa criminals who I plan to sue into oblivion and then sow salt into their yoga studios and avocado toast stands until nothing grows there, not even the glimmer of a violent criminal conspiracy aided by the effete impotence of a cowed city government,” Dhillon wrote.

Ngo was viciously assaulted on Saturday afternoon while he was covering Antifa protesters. In a video posted online, the journalist was kicked, punched, and had milkshakes thrown on him by the left-wing thugs. According to Portland Police, some of the milkshakes being tossed by Antifa reportedly contained quick-dry cement.

Soon after the attack, Dhillon informed the public that Ngo “is being admitted to the hospital overnight as a result of a brain bleed.”

“You sick ‘journalists’ and other hacks gloating about this should be ashamed,” she added. “As for the rest, please pray for [Andy Ngo] who we need back in health — brave man!”

Later that night, the lawyer said the Quillette editor “has been cleared to leave the hospital.”

“He’ll have more to say in coming days about what happened to him & others yesterday in Portland,” Dhillon promised. “He is very thankful for the overwhelming support from decent people, especially [Michelle Malkin] & donors.”

Malkin, a conservative commentator and investigative journalist, set up a GoFundMe account for Ngo in the wake of the attack; as of Monday morning, over $135,000 has been raised.

Dhillon has been at the forefront in high-profile cases concerning political bias. For example, the entrepreneur’s firm is representing former Google engineer James Damore, who was fired after penning an internal memo addressing diversity at the company, specifically in relation to intrinsic differences between the sexes.

Damore is suing the tech giant for alleged discrimination against conservatives, whites, and males, The Daily Wire previously reported. In the suit, Damore claims “employees who expressed views deviating from the majority view at Google on political subjects raised in the workplace and relevant to Google’s employment policies and its business, such as ‘diversity’ hiring policies, ‘bias sensitivity,’ or ‘social justice,’ were/are singled out, mistreated, and systematically punished and terminated from Google, in violation of their legal rights.” The case is still ongoing.

In addition to the potential lawsuit by Dhillon, at least three Antifa activists were arrested during the violent demonstrations, though it’s unclear if any if any of the arrests were made in connection to Ngo’s assault.

According to Fox 12 Oregon, two females and one male, all of whom are in their early 20s, were cuffed and charged:

Gage Halupowski, 23, on charges of second-degree assault and assault on a public safety officer.

James K. Stocks, 21, on the charge of harassment.

Maria C. Dehart, 23, on the charge of second-degree disorderly conduct and harassment.



  1. Joe

    July 1, 2019 at 8:46 pm

    About time someone is doing something

  2. Rick Everitt

    July 1, 2019 at 8:56 pm

    Why aren’t these people being arrested at these events. It is time to hold them personality accountable!

    • Linda

      July 1, 2019 at 9:53 pm

      Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler reportedly called on police officers to stand down on Saturday.

      • Michael

        July 1, 2019 at 10:28 pm

        Arrest him too, for aiding and abetting. If he’s not going to uphold the law, he’s breaking it. Lock his ass up.

        • STEVE

          July 2, 2019 at 1:42 am

          He’s also the police commissioner.

        • Mary Jo Peay

          July 2, 2019 at 5:29 am

          I agree. Why are mayors asking police officers to step down while Antifa members are beating and almost killing people. If they are that cowardly, then they need to removed from office.

    • william g munson

      July 1, 2019 at 11:43 pm

      Everybody that is wearing a mask should have been arrested and those that did that Jailed period and who ever in police did nothing fired and if someone gave a stand down order fired and Jail too

  3. PT

    July 1, 2019 at 9:12 pm

    Antifa uses Fascist ways to protest against everyone else who they claim are Fascist. Since they seem so proud of what they are doing, why aren’t they proud enough to let us see their faces and know exactly who they are? Because they are bottom feeding thugs and know they will be put in jail. Except, it appears, in Portland, Oregon where it seems they are best buds with the mayor.

  4. Robert Fitzhugh

    July 1, 2019 at 9:36 pm

    You go girl! Give em hell Marshall Dhillon!

  5. Josey

    July 1, 2019 at 9:38 pm

    Civil lawsuits against the perpetrators and their political enablers within the local governments and law enforcement, will be the only way to stop this discrimination and violence.


      July 2, 2019 at 7:09 am

      all these criminal activities will come to CRITICAL MASS, especially when there seems to be a vacuum in police presence ordered by the city’s mayor. that critical mass just might erupt into a full-blown intra-state civil war. even the state Governor did nothing except watch when he had good cause to call out the National Guard. at any rate, i foresee extreme potential violence. even moderates might be forced into taking a position because of the do-nothing action of the city government – just for the sake of self defense and preservation…..!

  6. Linda

    July 1, 2019 at 10:00 pm

    Attorney Harmeet K. Dhillon (Republican) is often a guest on Laura Ingraham’s show on Fox.

  7. Nick Byrne

    July 1, 2019 at 10:05 pm

    It’s damn funny to me they don’t come to carry states. I’m one Texan that invites the chicken s$&”s to come attack me. I’ll blow thier a$$ completely off.

    • STEVE

      July 2, 2019 at 1:56 am


      All the state’s in the 9th circuit court are open carry state’s now and must give you a conceal carry license when you pass a background check and Oregon is one of the states. Here are the rest, it was a surprise when it did not go to the full court and then the Supreme court.

      The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (in case citations, 9th Cir.) is a court of appeal that has appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:

      District of Alaska
      District of Arizona
      Central District of California
      Eastern District of California
      Northern District of California
      Southern District of California
      District of Hawaii
      District of Idaho
      District of Montana
      District of Nevada
      District of Oregon
      Eastern District of Washington
      Western District of Washington

      It also has appellate jurisdiction over the following territorial courts:

      District of Guam
      District of the Northern Mariana Islands


      The Liberal-Leaning Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Right to Self-Defense
      By Dave Dolbee published on July 27, 2018 in General

      Rub your eyes now, because you are not going to believe what you are about to read. Two different panels of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals have written opinions that, when taken together, equate to a roadmap for the right to “keep and bear arms” with the right to open or constitutional carry for self-defense.

      Magazine Bans:
      Last week, a divided court affirmed a trial court’s injunction blocking the state of California’s confiscation of so-called “large capacity” magazines. The court made two important statements. The first was that the Second Amendment protected ownership of weapons that have a “reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia.” The second key statement to the ruling statted “the ammunition for a weapon is similar to the magazine for a weapon.” That meant the state of California’s ban on magazines over 10 rounds was invalid under protections granted by the Second Amendment.

      This new ruling, combined with Heller’s clear statement that the Second Amendment protects weapons in “common use” for “lawful purposes,” clearly prohibits lawmakers from proclaiming firearms such as AR-15s to be assault weapons in an effort to diminish their protection under the constitution.

      Constitutional Carry:
      The second case was decided yesterday. A different panel of judges (in a 2-1 decision) struck down the state of Hawaii’s ban on openly carrying weapons outside the home. While this is an important victory, it is also a shift in the court’s thinking. The Ninth Circuit had previously ruled that the Second Amendment did not “preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public.” I am not sure if the court has simply come to a better understanding or the confirmation of Associate Justice Gorsuch and nomination of Kavanagh to the Supreme Court has simply forced them to wave the flag of surrender.

      The Ninth Circuit is made of Western states such as California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, and a few more. Whichever way the court ruled, the decision is likely to be challenged and escalated to the Supreme Court.

      The author of the majority opinion, Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain, used a comprehensive analysis of early-American and post-Civil War gun rights debates (including the racist history of Reconstruction-era carry limitations on black Americans) and concluded that while the Second Amendment may not protect a right to concealed carry, it most definitely protects a right to carry.

      The practical effect of the decision, especially combined with other case law, demonstrates that the state has a choice: protect a right to concealed carry, protect a right to open carry, or protect both. But if you block a citizen’s right to carry entirely (or limit the right to a “small and insulated subset of law-abiding citizens”), you violate those citizens’ right to “bear” arms.

      Now is the time to get this in the rest of the country.

  8. Richard Young

    July 1, 2019 at 11:00 pm

    This is sick! It is time for Conservatives and Trump supporters to start carrying there own weapons, baseball bats or some other thing to (only) defend themselves against this violent, hateful group of fascist terrorists. Why should one group of people have weapons while the other group can’t even defend themselves?

  9. Michigander

    July 2, 2019 at 12:34 am

    How about declaring ANTIFA a terrorist organization and deal with them as terrorists. Bunch of coward who won’t show their faces and actually run when confronted by someone bigger.

    • rosi d

      July 2, 2019 at 2:19 am

      92% of them still live with Mommy and/or Daddy

    • Martha

      July 2, 2019 at 2:39 am



    July 2, 2019 at 7:42 am

    It is about time we FIGHT back with these evil anitfa groups of COWARDS that do not show who they are… I hope the lawyer for Mr. Ngo throws EVERYTHING at these monsters…IT IS TIME TO GO AFTER THEM!

  11. Dale Michael Williams

    July 2, 2019 at 2:55 pm

    When you have violence, any lawful action by a mob becomes a Felony called “Felony Unlawful Mob Action”. When that action insures even a single strand of hair on any living creature, it becomes “Felony Unlawful Mob Action by Inciting a Riot”. And removing anything from anyone, even a single strand of hair – is “Felony Strong Armed Robbery”. But look at the bright side Mr. Ngo! There is a picture of at least three assailants. In the middle is a pathetic spineless cowardly excuse for a man. But, what should we expect?! I mean, he is in the middle of a pair of pussies, so he equates his manhood to that of a pussy with his violence. So, letus shall we – send him a skirt and a tampon. He’ll need them in prison when he bends over, or is on his knees paying for his behavior.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *