Connect with us

First, she douses progressives’ impeachment dreams in cold water, telling the Washington Post that such a divisive and drastic political step should only be taken over egregious criminality that’s “compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan.”

She cagily adds, “he’s just not worth it,” a personal swipe at the president, likely deployed to placate Trump haters who will bristle at her stance. Insulting him is a little wink that she’s still ‘on the team.’ But even if the hard-Left wing of the party is willing to forgive Pelosi’s hesitant posture on impeachment, how might they react to her intense fiscal skepticism on ‘Medicare for All’ — the holy grail of the statist agenda? Via Rolling Stone:

When they say Medicare for All, people have to understand this: Medicare for All is not as good a benefit as the Affordable Care Act. It doesn’t have catastrophic [coverage] — you have to go buy it. It doesn’t have dental. It’s not as good as the plans that you can buy under the Affordable Care Act. So I say to them, come in with your ideas, but understand that we’re either gonna have to improve Medicare — for all, including seniors — or else people are not gonna get what they think they’re gonna get. And by the way, how’s it gonna be paid for?

Now, single-payer is a different thing. People use the terms interchangeably. Sometimes it could be the same thing, but it’s not always. Single-payer is just about who pays. It’s not about what the benefits are. That is, administratively, the simplest thing to do, but to convert to it? Thirty trillion dollars. Now, how do you pay for that? So I said, “Look, just put them all on the table, and let’s have the discussion, and let people see what it is. But know what it is that you’re talking about.” All I want is the goal of every American having access to health care. You don’t get there by dismantling the Affordable Care Act.

These strike me as hugely consequential quotes, given the source. Both Bernie Sanders’ and House Democrats’ bills would repeal virtually the entire existing American system, including Obamacare, and replace it with a massively expensive government-run program.

Pelosi attempts to draw a distinction between “Medicare for All” and “single payer,” but they’re different terms for the same concept. And she’s quite obviously worried about paying for said concept, asking twice how it would be funded.

She knows the answer: Shocking, across-the-board tax increases, all in pursuit of a system that she is actively arguing would be worse than current policy. May I remind you, this is Nancy Pelosi making these arguments, not some right-winger. It’s clear that the Speaker is not interested in parroting certain presidential candidates’ breezy talking points about “costs” being irrelevant due to “return on investment,” or whatever. Money and debt are real.

Senate Republicans are also highlighting quotes from other significant Democrats dismissing single-payer as unrealistically expensive, including the chairwoman of the DCCC, who calls the $33 trillion price tag “a little scary.”

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who just decided to forego a 2020 run, says the proposal would “bankrupt us for a very long time.” Perhaps most devastatingly, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo called the idea insane, telling legislators that passing single-payer in his state would “double everybody’s taxes:”

I ask Cuomo, if he sees himself as the model for the country, how progressive he is prepared to go. “Single payer. Okay. Pass it. I’ll sign it. You pass it, I’ll sign it,” Cuomo says. But … would he want to sign it? “No, but no sane person will pass it,” he says. So he’s daring the legislature to pass it? “Oh no. If they pass it, I’ll sign it,” he says. Even though he thinks it’ll blow up the state budget? “Yeah, well, you’d double everybody’s taxes. You want to do that? Let’s go,” he says. “They can never pass it. But I have no problem with the dare. Every union is against it. The hospitals are against it. The Civil Service Employees Association is against it. The 1199 health-care union is against it.

Damn. The party’s base is dead set on a policy that is fiscally untenable. Some Democratic politicians understand this, others do not, and still others are aware of the math, but are still willing to pander for votes by peddling delusions.

These factions are on a collision course; it’ll be fascinating to watch. Speaking of internal tensions, following the AOC/Omar contingent flexing its muscles and embarrassing leadership on the ‘anti-hate’ resolution battle, it sounds like Steny Hoyer is growing a bit impatient with the new kids on the block:

Double damn. And USA Today discovers that he’s hardly alone:

Some moderates say that the approach Ocasio-Cortez has taken on these topics has been unrealistic and it has left little room for the bipartisan compromise they promised voters during midterm campaigns.

They are also irritated at Ocasio-Cortez’s willingness to use her personal platform – nearly 3.5 million followers on Twitter and a nationwide following – to go after members of her own party. Even House progressives who like her policies don’t know what to make of her approach.

I’ll leave you with the latest mathematical reminder that additional tax-the-rich schemes (wealthy Americans already pay more than their fair share) will not come close to financing the left-wing’s policy agenda.

Advertisement
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Tom95988

    March 13, 2019 at 12:08 pm

    Pelosi you idiotic piece of crap, if you think the money is there to put everyone on Medicare then there must be money there to pay for all the medical needs like hearing aids, glasses, dental work done and prescriptions paid for those who have paid for Medicare their whole life. Instead you stupid idiot want to give it to everyone,they haven’t worked and paid into it their whole career like the ones that have it now and continue to pay even when they are no longer in the work force and have to purchase supplement because it doesn’t pay for everything. You and your constituents are nothing but a bunch of goldiggers. All you elected politicians should have to be on Medicare and Social Security after you retire and see how well you like it.if you did I know there would be a lot more in the funds and you wouldn’t have to pay for anything

  2. Rocky

    March 13, 2019 at 12:14 pm

    The same way YOU forced ObamaCare on us ! THAT is how you would pay for it.

  3. fred

    March 13, 2019 at 2:03 pm

    Now Nanvy has the democrats totally screed up.. she just shot their biggest campaign promises DOWN, took thw wind right out of their sails… the FAR laft possible could start a recall avctio to remover from her Speakers Job,,,,,we couldn’t be so lucky,,, by the tome the 2020 electiobns come around they will be lucky to find a candidate that has a small outsode change of getting 30 percent of the Amreican votes,,,remember this timE VOTER PHOTO ID WILL BE REQUIRED IN ALL STATES AND PROVINCES….NO DOOR TO DOOR SOLICITSITATION OF BALLOTS…

  4. Raymond Paltoo

    March 13, 2019 at 3:00 pm

    Well you reap the results of the whirlwind that you sowed. AOC does not know. She just thinks the money will appear if yu tax eeryone up to ninety percent. She is moral and we are not.

  5. Al

    March 13, 2019 at 9:11 pm

    Peelosi admits that Obamacare is a horrid system. The demonRATS screwed up medical care; reduced hourly workers to 35 hours a week; stole from Medicare; stole from Social Security to fund Obamacare. Now, they tell us Medicare and Social Security is BROKE! Use the VA Hospital system for a great example of government-run medical care.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CF